Natural Process - Endnotes

Author's Note: These notes are the same as in the book with one exception. If there is a URL listed in the paper copy that has been superceded, or if I find a more reliable reference, I update the link. Most of the URLs listed here are in text because that is what the printer wanted. Maybe I'll fix that, someday. If you find any such links here that don't work, please let me know using the Book Content Contact Page. Thanks

Each of these notes has an html tag so that you can refer people directly to them on the Internet or by email. Just highlight the tag, right click your mouse, and "Copy link location." Format the tag as follows:

http://www.naturalprocess.net/np_pages/endnotes.html#_163 lands you at Note 163 re EO-12986 (no frames, sorry).

Endnotes to Part I

Chapter 1 – Stuff, and What You Can Do With the Stuff

  1. Hardin, Garrett; The Tragedy of the Commons, Science, 162 (1968): 1243-1248. URL: http://dieoff.com; Charming Web Site.
  2. Harris, George Washington; Sicily Burns’s Wedding, Native American Humor, Walter Blair (ed.), Harper & Row, 1960, pp368-88. It’s really funny!

    3. Chapter 2 – Artificial Preservation

  3. Diamond, William J.; Practical Experiment Designs for Engineers and Scientists, 2nd Edition, Nostrand Rheinhold, 1989, pp 20-22.
  4. John, Peter W. M.; Statistical Methods in Engineering and Quality Assurance; Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, 1990, pp 115, 120.
  5. Carnap, Rudolf; Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, University of California Press, SBN 520-01417-0; pp305-340; 1967.
  6. Bonnicksen, Thomas M.; Department of Forest Science, Texas A&M University; AMERICA’S ANCIENT FORESTS, From the Ice Age to the Age of Discovery; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2000.
  7. Devall, Bill & George Sessions; Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered. Salt Lake City, Peregrine Smith; 1985.
  8. American Policy Center; Ref to Curriculum Vitae of Bill Devall; The DeWeese Report, May 1999.
  9. Naess, Arne; George Sessions; Clearcut: The Tragedy of Industrial Forestry, edited by Bill Devall; Sierra Club Books and Earth Island Press, 1993.
  10. Lovelock, James; Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1979.
  11. MacGillivray, Joseph Alexander; Sir Arthur Evans and the Archaeology of the Minoan Myth; Hill & Wang Pub; June 2000; pp142, 152, 168; ISBN: 0809030357.
  12. James Lovelock’s Home Page, URL: http://www.ion.com.au/ourplanet/gaia.html.
  13. Drengson, Alan and Yuichi Inoue, Editors. 1995. The Deep Ecology Movement: An Introductory Anthology. Berkeley, North Atlantic Publishers.
  14. Grey, William; Anthropocentrism and Deep Ecology; Australiasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 71, No 4. (1993), pp. 463-475.
  15. Rifkin, Jeremy, SnuffIt 4, Church of Euthanasia, found at: http://www.enviroweb.org/coe. This site has to be visited to be appreciated. You won’t find it on the enviroweb menu.
  16. Harding, Stephan; WHAT IS DEEP ECOLOGY?; Resurgence 185 http://www.gn.apc.org/resurgence/185/Harding185.htm
  17. Dave Foreman, Confessions of an Eco-Warrior, (Harmony Books, 1991).
  18. McLaughlin, Andrew, The Heart of Deep Ecology, from Freedom.org, 1999.
  19. Reed F. Noss, The Wildlands Project, Wild Earth, Special Issue, 1992, p. 21. URL: http://www.wildlandsproject.org.
  20. IUCN Membership Guidelines, 1996, p.4.
  21. IUCN: Membership List, June, 1998, p. 21.
  22. Dues: IUCN Membership Guidelines, 1996, p. 20.
  23. Moore, Patrick; Green Spirit: trees are the answer; http://www.greenspirit.com; ISBN 0-9686404-0-0.
  24. Fumento, Michael, Science Under Siege, William Morrow and Co.., 1993; p.19.
  25. Feshbach, Murray; Alfred Friendly Jr.; Ecocide in the USSR: Health and Nature Under Siege; Basic Books (A Division of HarperCollins), 1991.
  26. East Europe’s Dark Dawn; National Geographic, June 1991.

    27. Chapter 3 – What’s "The Problem"?

  27. Santa Cruz Public Library; Santa Cruz Weather Statistics; Record rainfall for Watsonville, 1975-76: 8.49"; Boulder Creek, 1889-90: 124.7".

    28. (Notes 28-36 were acquired from the Save the Redwoods League web site.)

  28. Abbott, L.L. 1987. The effect of fire on subsequent growth of surviving trees in an old-growth redwood forest in Redwood National Park, California. M.S. thesis, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California, 90 pp.

    29. Fire scarring, basal sprouts, and annual growth rates were examined in 1986 in an old-growth redwood forest to assess the effect of a 1974 surface fire on the subsequent growth of surviving trees. Fire scarring took place predominantly on the uphill side of trees. Basal sprouting was induced by the 1974 fire. Mean tree ring chronologies displayed an increase of ring width following two fires in 1894 and 1974, most likely due to a reduction in competition.

  29. Brown, P.M. and T.W. Swetnam; A cross-dated fire history from coast redwood near Redwood National Park, California. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24: 21–31; 1994.

    30. Cross-dating methods (i.e., the use of a master tree-ring history developed from numerous trees to act as a baseline or control for comparison with the fire-scarred tree samples) showed the mean fire interval in the study area to be 7.0 years, between the years of 1714 and 1762. These intervals are shorter than those reported in many previous fire-history studies and the authors suggest that fire frequency in redwood may have been underestimated in many past studies.

  30. Finney, M.A. and R.E. Martin. 1989. Fire history in a Sequoia sempervirens forest at Salt Point State Park, California. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19: 1451–1457.

    31. It is difficult to generalize about patterns of fire occurrence throughout the natural range of coast redwood. Part of the reason is due to the different methodologies employed in fire history studies. This study investigated historical fire occurrence in the (coast redwood and bishop pine) forests at Salt Point State Park, California, and compared the results from two techniques used to analyze fire history data. Mean fire intervals estimated from point data (20.5 to 29.0 years) were more than three times greater than mean intervals from composite data (6.1 to 9.3 years.)

  31. Finney, M.A. and R.E. Martin. 1992. Short fire intervals recorded by redwoods at Annadel State Park, CA. Madroño. CALIFORNIA BOTANICAL SOC., 39(4): 251–262. URL:http://ucjeps.herb.berkeley.edu/Madrono.html.

    32. This paper reports fire history evidence from fire scars recorded on coast redwood trees which grow in isolated groves within oak and mixed evergreen forests. All fire scars are believed to predate European settlement in the early 1800s, and the earliest scars date from the 14th century. During this period, mean fire intervals between 6.2 and 23.0 were found.

  32. Greenlee, J.M. and J.H. Langenheim. 1990. Historic fire regimes and their relation to vegetation patterns in the Monterey Bay Area of California. American Midland Naturalist 124: 239–253.

    33. Fire history in the Monterey Bay area of California, concentrating on the area forested with coast redwood, was categorized into five fire regimes: prehuman (lightning- ignition), aboriginal, Spanish occupation, Anglo, and recent. Fire occurrence and coverage based on estimates (i.e., modeling fire behavior), natural records (e.g., fire scar dating), or human records (e.g., from newspapers, journals and fire records for Anglo and recent fire regimes) were compared for the five regimes. It is estimated that prehuman fire intervals in the redwood forest of this area were approximately 135 years. The frequency of fires apparently increased in the aboriginal (17–82 years), Spanish (82 years), and Anglo (20–50 years) fire regimes, and has decreased recently (130 years) due to limitation of human-caused fires. It is concluded that the present fire regime is similar in several respects to that which existed prior to the arrival of humans.

  33. Finney, M.A. and R.E. Martin. 1993a. Modeling effects of prescribed fire on young-growth coast redwood trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23: 1125–1135.

    34. Old-growth coast redwoods are very resistant and resilient to fire; young or small trees are more susceptible to fire damage or mortality. Using controlled fire treatments, models were developed relating fire characteristics, tree characteristics, and tree damage from fire. Tree diameter, surface fuel consumption, flame length, and crown scorch were significant predictors in all models of top killing and basal sprouting.

  34. Finney, M.A. and R.E. Martin. 1993b. Fuel loading, bulk density, and depth of forest floor in coast redwood stands. Forest Science, Society of American Foresters 39(3): 617–622.

    35. Fire characteristics, such as intensity and coverage, are influence by fuel loading on the forest floor. Measurements of fuel loading can be helpful in predicting the effects of fire on soils and plants. The depth and density of forest floor fuel were measured in two coast redwood sites in northern California. Results suggested that, for practical purposes of estimating fuel loading, a constant bulk density could be assumed.

  35. Griffin, J.R. 1978. The Marble-Cone fire ten months later. Fremontia, The Journal of the California Native Plant Society. 8: 8–14.

    36. A large fire burned in Los Padres National Forest in Monterey County, California, for three weeks, consuming chaparral, mixed hardwood forests (including Santa Lucia fir), mixed conifer forests (including ponderosa pine and incense-cedar), and some coast redwood groves. The author noted that many of the charred redwoods were sprouting from the base within a month of the fire. He suggests that redwood regrowth will probably be good, although a few redwood groves at higher elevations in the Big Sur drainage may have been killed as no sprouting was observed within a year of the fire.

  36. Jacobs, D.F., D.W. Cole, and J.R. McBride. 1985. Fire history and perpetuation of natural coast redwood ecosystems. Journal of Forestry, Society of American Foresters. 83(8): 494–497.

    37. Fire scars on stumps were used to determine the presettlement fire history of a coast redwood forest in Marin County, California, near Muir Woods National Monument. The mean interval between fires at one site was 27 years, while at a more inland site the interval was 22 years. The difference in fire intervals is attributed to a summer fog gradient.

  37. Nives, S.L. 1989. Fire behavior on the forest floor in coastal redwood forest, Redwood National Park. M.S. thesis, Humboldt State Univ., Arcata, CA, 73 pp.

    38. Experimental fires, ignited during the summer and fall of 1986 in stands of redwood located in Redwood National Park, determined the fuel bed characteristics (i.e., fuel depth, load, and moisture) and local weather conditions (i.e., temperature and relative humidity) necessary to sustain a low intensity ground fire. Elevation and topographic position were found to be main factors to determine ease of fire ignition and rates of spread. Fuel depth and load appeared to affect the intensity and duration of the fires and rate of spread.

  38. Veirs, S.D., Jr. 1979. The role of fire in northern coast redwood forest vegetation dynamics. In Proc. Second Conference on Scientific Research in the National Parks, Nov. 26–30, 1979, San Francisco, CA. Vol. 10: Fire Ecology, National Park Service, Washington, D.C. pp. 190–209.

    39. It is essential to understand the role of natural fires in forests dominated by Sequoia sempervirens to establish appropriate management policies in parks such as the Redwood National Park in California. The role of fire in the northern part of the species’ range is studied and found to have a moderate ecological role. Light fires which do not open the canopy tend to maintain redwood dominance, while fires of higher intensity and greater frequency, as tend to occur on the hotter, drier inland sites, favor Douglas-fir over redwood.

  39. Lydon, Sandy; Professor of History, Cabrillo College, Early settlers shunned dirty river water; Santa Cruz County Sentinel, 3/24/97.
  40. 1995-1997 Survey of Graduates, University of California, Santa Cruz; URL: http://planning.ucsc.edu/IRPS/ENROLLMT/GRADS/9597/REPORT.PDF.

Endnotes to Part II

Chapter 1 – Gamecock Canyon

  1. Dean, Kathy; Various quotes from her web page on file are from: http://pages.prodigy.net/kathy_dean/index.html. This page is now, defunct.
  2. Dean, Kathy; Quotes from The Mountain Network News; URL: http://www.mnn.net/gamecock.htm.
  3. State of California Government Code. Sections 51100 – 51155, Timberland Productivity Act of 1982, URL: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.html/gov_table_of_contents.html.
  4. Herbert, Elizabeth; FAQ -- Frequently Asked Questions, How to combat logging plans, Don’t Wait for the Chainsaws …URL:http://www.responsible-neighbors.org/crfm.
  5. Herbert, Elizabeth; County Timber Plan Is Laudable, Sentinel (Santa Cruz), Sunday, 18 Oct., 1998; URL: http://www.netlive.net/tree/sentinel_101898.html.
  6. Craig, Joe; Response to Kathy Dean; Mountain Network News, Vol XII, No. 4, April, 1999, p6.
  7. Hamlin, Mark, President SRA; # # # # #; Mountain Network News, Vol XII, No. 4, April, 1999, p37.
  8. Board of Directors, CRFM, Response to Hamlin; Mountain Network News, Vol XII, No. 5, May, 1999, p37.
  9. Luker, Kelly; The Timber Wolves; Metro Santa Cruz, March 20, 1997. URL: http://www.metroactive.com/papers/cruz/03.20.97/logging-9712.html.
  10. Luker, Kelly; Empire Statements, Timber giant Redwood Empire is under continuing attack for questionable logging practices in Gamecock Canyon, Metro Santa Cruz, April. 16,1996; URL: http://www.metroactive.com/papers/cruz/04.16.98/logging2-9815.html.
  11. Hoffman, Russell D.; Why No Cut? A consideration of the complicated environmental and political Issues regarding the California Redwoods; 1996. URL: http://www.animatedsoftware.com/misc/stories/redwoods/redwoods.htm.
  12. Herbert, Elizabeth; FIGHT BACK! A citizen’s guide to forest preservation in Santa Cruz County, CRFM; URL: http://www.responsible-neighbors.org/crfm.
  13. CRFM, again! URL: http://www.strategize.com/crfm. Strategize is in corporate computing strategy business.
  14. Neighbors for Responsible Logging; URL: http://www.responsible-neighbors.org/links.html.
  15. Summit Water Protection League URL: http://www.mnn.net/summit.htm. The local newspaper gives them free space?
  16. Cal. State Board of Forestry, Proposed Amendments to Forest Practice Rules, Santa Cruz Co. Rules, 1998 Proposed Rule Language [Sept. 9, 1998], p14.
  17. California State Board of Forestry, Proposed Changes to Forest Practice Rules, Santa Cruz County Rules, 1999 Proposed Rule Language [from July 7, 1999] Adopt Section 926.11,15-17, 24-30
  18. DRAFT Review Pursuant to Memorandum of Agreement between the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Southwest Region and the State of California (State) on North Coast Steelhead Trout, analysis of the California Forest Practice Rules (FPR): The NMFS review of the FPRs to the State, and the State response to NMFS analysis. Dated 7/10/98.
  19. Knight, Katherine; The Soquel Demonstration Forest shows why local citizens and California forestry officials are not knocking on wood together; Metro Santa Cruz, Dec. 12,1996. URL: http://www.metroactive.com/papers/cruz/12.12.96/forests-9650.html.
  20. Krumland, Bruce, PhD, RPF #1768; Comments on the Proposed Amendments to California Forest Practice Rules, [Santa Cruz County], Oct. 5, 1998, 5pp.
  21. Record of Conversation with David Smelt, adjacent property owner of Roger Burch; on-site visit dated 5/17/99.
  22. Smelt, David; Periodic Peak Temperature Data from Gamecock Creek, 1999.
  23. Records of Conversation with Peter Twight, RPF#2555, 5/15/99, 10/25/99.
  24. The 2090 Agreement, a Memo of Understanding between the California Department of Fish and Game and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection dated May 9, 1994; Section 2090 of the Fish and Game Code.
  25. Briggs, Robert O.; Competition Between the Waddell Creek Forest and Creek for Limited Dry Season Ground-Stored Water, Davenport Geological Society, Oct. 1997, 22pp.
  26. Key Elements of the CDF Gamecock Canyon File for THP 1-96-275 SCR; available through CDF Felton Office 831-335-6740.
  27. Osipowich, Tom, RPF #1767; Deputy Chief, Forest Practice, CDF, Letter to Mr. Roger Burch from Caig E. Athony, Deputy Director for Resource Management; Dated Jan. 226, 1998; 2pp.
  28. Briggs, Roger W.; Executive Officer, Cal/EPA Letter to Mr. Roger Burch, Dated January 12, 1998;
  29. POST HARVEST INSPECTION OF TIMBER HARVEST PLAN, (THP) 1-96-275 SCR, DECEMBER 15-16, 1997, REDWOOD EMPIRE, GAMECOCK CANYON; 2pp; HK\H:\WINWORD\FOREST\96275.DOCZZ
  30. CDF Memorandum Detailing List of Major Violations, December, 1997.
  31. From: Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, San Mateo / Santa Cruz Ranger Unit; Memorandum To: Lloyd I Keefer, Region Chief, Coast-Cascade Region; Subject: Record of Preharvest Inspection dated, 7-10-96 and Preharvest Inspection dated 7-24-96. Date: July 29, 1996.

    32. Chapter 2 – For Love or Money? An Overview of Redwood Timber Markets

  32. US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Program for the National Forests, Miscellaneous Publication No. 794, April 1959, 26pp.
  33. Leydet, François; The Last Redwoods and the Parkland of Redwood Creek, Sierra Club Books, 1969, pp65-73.
  34. MacCleery, Douglas W.; American Forests, A History of Resiliency and Recovery, Forest History Society, 1996, ISBN 0-89030-048-8, 58pp.
  35. O’Toole, Randal; Memo to President Clinton: The Forest Service Has Already Been Reinvented --and You Fired the Man Who Oversaw It; You can find this article from the following URL: http://www.ti.org/index.html.
  36. BAYSIDE TIMBER COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN MATEO COUNTY; LEXSEE 20 Cal. App. 3d 1; Civ. No. 28244, Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, Division One, 20 Cal. App. 3d 1; 1971 Cal. App. LEXIS 1144; 97 Cal. Rptr. 431; 3 ERC (BNA) 1078; 1 ELR 20425; September 16, 1971.
  37. Z’berg Nejedly Forest Practices Act of 1973, Title 14 California Code of Regulations, Division 1.5, Chapter 4, Subchapter 6, Southern District Rules; URL:http://www.calregs.com/cgi-bin/om_isapi.dll?infobase=CCR&softpage=Browse_Frame_Pg42.
  38. Z’berg, Warren, Keene, Collier, Forest Taxation Relief Act of 1976, Assembly Bill 1258.
  39. Pillsbury, Norman H., RPF; Timber Inventory, Volume Tables, and Growth Estimates for Santa Cruz County, California; Oct. 1979, Tables 1, 7-11.
  40. Coclasure, P.; Joel Moen; Charles L. Bolsinger; Timber Resource Statistics for the Central Coast Resource Area of California, Portland OR: Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station Resource Bulletin PNW-133, 32pp.
  41. Waddell, Karen L. and Patricia M.Bassett, Timber Resource Statistics for the North Coast Resource Area of California, Portland OR: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station Resource Bulletin PNW-RB-214, September 1996, 50pp.
  42. Waddell, Karen L. and Patricia M.Bassett, Timber Resource Statistics for the Central Coast Resource Area of California Portland OR: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station Resource Bulletin PNW-RB-221, March 1997, 45pp.
  43. Butler, Steven M. RPF#2390 & Edward A. Tunheim RPF#79; Edward A. Tunheim Consulting Forester, City of Santa Cruz Water Department Forest Management Report, 1994 pp8, 29-31, 44-45, & 83-84.
  44. California State Board of Equalization, California Timber Tax Yield Law, January 1995, Pamphlet No. 43, 88pp.
  45. California Revenue and Taxation Code, Division 2, Part 18.5, Chapter 4, Timber Reserve Fund Tax; Sections 38301-38303. (Repealed in 1984).
  46. Wilson, Frank and Bob Rossi, California State Board of Equalization, Timber Tax Division, Fax transmittals of harvest volumes and values, 12pp, 3/17/99; 3pp, 4/20/99; 2pp, 3/17/99.
  47. California State Board of Equalization, Timber Tax Division, Timber Harvest by County, URL: http://www.boe.ca.gov/proptaxes/pdf/harvcnty.pdf YTHR2 REPORT YT-36, YTR90-96.xls.
  48. Tunheim, Edward A. Consulting Forester, RPF#79, Price histories 1960-77, fax transmission, 3/29/99 on file.
  49. Lindquist, James & Marshall Palley, Prediction of Stand Growth of Young Redwoods, California Agricultural Experiment Station, Bulletin 831, April 1967, pp30,31.
  50. Merenlender, Adina M.; Kerry L. Heise; Colin Brooks; Effects of Subdividing Private Propertyon Biodiversity in California’s North Coast Oak Woodlands; TRANSACTIONS OF THE WESTERN SECTION OF THE WILDLIFE SOCIETY 34:9-20; 1998.
  51. County of Santa Cruz, Comparative Tax Rates Per $100.00 of Assessed Valuation for the Last Ten Fiscal Years; 1965-66 to 1974-75; pp122-125.
  52. Sterling Publishing Co., The Encyclopedia of Wood, 1989; ISBN 0-8069-6994-6 Paper, Table 3-3, Chapter 3, 28pp.
  53. Santa Cruz Association of Realtors, Inc.; Multiple Listings Service Books; This data was hand copied from books and binders of data from 1962-1999.
  54. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Consumer Price Index, 1967-1999. URL: ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt.
  55. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Consumer Price Index, 1967-1999U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. CPI for Douglas Fir Lumber, 1926-1999. Series ID : WPU081 Not Seasonally Adjusted; URL: http://146.142.4.24/cgi-bin/surveymost.
  56. County of Santa Cruz, County of Santa Cruz Statement of Assessed Valuation and Tax Rates 1974-1975, Annual Financial Report, for the Fiscal Year End of June 30, 1975; Arthur Merrill, Auditor-Controller.
  57. County of Santa Cruz, Comparative Tax Rates Per $100.00 of Assessed Valuation for the 5-Year period 1974-75 to 1978-79, pp82-87.

    58. Chapter 3 – Developing Hostility

  58. Santa Cruz Association of Realtors, Inc.; Multiple Listings Service Books; This data was hand copied from books and binders of data from 1962-1999.
  59. Chapter 13.41.040, County of Santa Cruz Government Code; GROWTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; Election Department, County of Santa Cruz; FULL TEXT OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY MEASURE"J."
  60. Moore, Wayne L. Jr.; ARGUMENTS AGAINST MEASURE "J"; Election Department, County of Santa Cruz.
  61. Moore, Wayne L. Jr.; REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENTS FOR MEASURE "J"; Election Department, County of Santa Cruz.
  62. Patton, Gary; Phil Baldwin; Ed Borovatz, Supervisors, County of Santa Cruz; REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENTS AGAINST MEASURE "J"; Election Department, County of Santa Cruz.
  63. LandWatch: Who We Are; pp1-7; URL:http://www.landwatch.org/pages/whoweare.html.
  64. Planning Department, County of Santa Cruz; MAP "A" EXISTING URBANIZED AREAS.
  65. Planning Department, County of Santa Cruz; MAP "B" MAXIMUM POSSIBLE 1990 URBAN DEVELOPMENT.
  66. Patton, Gary, et al., Supervisors, County of Santa Cruz; ENACTMENT OF A GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY; 3/16/78.
  67. Sanson, Ralph; Dan D. Forbus; Phil Harry; Henry J. Mello; George L. Cress Jr.; Supervisors, County of Santa Cruz; ORDINANCE NO. 2093 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13.08 OF THE SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CODE REGARDING SUBDIVISIONS. The ordinance, passed Feb. 25, 1975, placed the cutoff date for preexisting subdivisions at Jan. 21, 1972.
  68. CALIFORNIA SUBDIVISION MAP ACT; Section 66410 California Government Code. The code placed the cutoff date for preexisting subdivisions at March 4, 1972 per 66412.6 (a). URL: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.html/gov_table_of_contents.html.

Endnotes to Part III

Chapter 2 – Getting Off on Good Behavior

  1. OP Cit, Hardin, Garrett; The Tragedy of the Commons, Science, 162(1968):1243-1248. URL:http://dieoff.com. Still Dreadful.
  2. OP Cit, Harris, George Washington; Sicily Burns’s Wedding, Native American Humor, Walter Blair (ed.), Harper & Row; 1960, pp368-88.
  3. Alchain, Armen; & William R. Allen; Exchange and Production: Competition, Coordination, and Control, Second Edition; Wadsworth, Belmont, CA; 1977.
  4. Nicholson, Walter; Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extensions, Second Edition; Dryden Press; 1978; pp568-571.
  5. Anderson, Terry L. and Donald R. Leal Free Market Environmentalism. Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy. Boulder: Westview Press; 1991.
  6. Adler, Jonathan; Libertarian Solutions: Environmental protection through private property and private action; Competitive Enterprise Institute in Washington, DC.
  7. Society of American Foresters, SAF Periodicals, URL: http://www.safnet.org/pubs/periodicals.html.
  8. AF&PA American Forest & Paper Association; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY PRINCIPLES AND IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES; as approved by AF&PA Board of Directors on October 14, 1994; URL: http://www.batnet.com/woodcom/afpa/afpabp02.html.
  9. Forest Stewardship Council A.C;.FSC Bylaws Reference http://www.fscoax.org Forest Stewardship Council A.C. By-Laws. Doc. 1.1. (Ratified, September 1994; Editorial Revision, October 1996; Revised February 1999).
  10. FSC; FSC Principles and Criteria. Doc. 1.2; Revised January 1999.
  11. FSC; Roles rights and responsibilities of FSC players. Doc. 2.10.
  12. FSC; Group Certification: FSC Guidelines for Certification Bodies Doc. 3.6.1; July 31, 1998.
  13. FSC; FSC Process Guidelines for Developing Regional Certification Standards; Doc. 4.2; February 1998.
  14. FSC; 5.2.2, FSC Membership List; FSC Doc. 5.2.2.; July 1999.
  15. FSC; List of Accredited Certification Bodies; Doc. 5.3.1; July 1999.
  16. FSC; List of Certified Forests; DOC. 5.3.3; September 30, 1999.
  17. AF&PA Sustainable Forestry Implementation Guidelines; URL:http://www.afandpa.org/Forestry/guidelines.html.
  18. FOREST CONSERVATION PROGRAM, PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND OPERATIONS MANUAL, OCTOBER 1995 RELEASE; Scientific Certification Systems, 1 Kaiser Plaza, Oakland, CA, URL:http://www.scs1.org.
  19. Institute for Sustainable Forestry/SmartWood, ISF/SmartWood, 46 Humboldt Street, Willits, CA 95490, Phone: 707-459-5499 Fax: 707-456-185.
  20. SmartWood, Goodwin-Baker Building, 61 Millet St., Richmond, VT 05477.
  21. Certified Forest Products Council, 14780 SW Osprey Drive, Suite 285, Beaverton, OR 97007; phone (503) 590-6600; fax: (503) 590-6655.
  22. Lewis, Robert O.; Independent Verification and Validation : A Life Cycle Engineering Process for Quality Software (New Dimensions in Engineering); John Wiley & Sons; ISBN: 0471570117 ; 356pp (October 1992).

    23. Chapter 3 – What’s It Worth To You?

  23. Canadian Standards Association; PLUS 1139; Integrated Checklist for Environmental Management Systems and Sustainable Forest Management Systems. URL: http://www.csa-international.org/english/home/index.htm.
  24. Arnold, Ron; Undue Influence: Wealthy Foundations, Grant Driven Environmental Groups and Zealous Bureaucrats That Control Your Future; Paperback - 344 pages (October 1, 1999); Free Enterprise Pr; ISBN: 093957120X.

    25. Chapter 4 – Property Transfer Functions

  25. D’Azzo, John J.; Linear Control Systems Analysis and Design; Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, 1981, Figures, 2.12-13 Plant Transfer Functions, p451.

    26. Chapter 5 – Stuff, and What You Can Do With the Stuff

  26. J. Bishop Grewell, Tiny microbes living in the mud-pots and geysers of Yellowstone National Park have sparked a mammoth controversy, PERC.org.
  27. Caruba, Alan; Condors Galore; Conservative News Service, Analysis from the National Anxiety Center, October 11, 1999.
  28. National Audubon Society; Kill the Condors?; URL: http://www.condor-pass.org/background.html.
  29. National Audubon Society; NATIONAL AUDUBON APPLAUDS ENRON WIND CORP. DECISION TO PURSUE ALTERNATE SITE FOR WIND POWER DEVELOPMENT; New York, NY; November 3, 1999; URL: http://www.audubon.org/news/release/enron.html.
  30. Rural Advancement Foundation, International (RAFI); Terminator Two Years Later: RAFI Update on Terminator/Traitor Technology a report prepared for COP5 in Nairobi, May 15-26 2000; URL: http://www.rafi.org/web/docus/pdfs/00may12attach.pdf.
  31. Monsanto Statement on Bt Corn: Environmental Safety and a Recent Report on the Monarch Butterfly, PR Newswire May 20, 1999; URL: http://www.biotech-info.net/monsanto_on_btcorn.html.
  32. The Biotechnology Knowledge Centre, Bt Corn And Monarch Butterfly Factsheet; Reference No.:3287, 28 April 2000; URL http://biotechknowledge.com/showlibsp.php3?uid=3287.

Endnotes to Part IV

Chapter 1 – Landowner On the Loose!!!

  1. Russell, Terry and Renny; On The Loose; Sierra Club Books 1967, p7.
  2. Thomas, John Hunter; Flora of the Santa Cruz Mountains; Stanford Univ. Press, 1961, p11
  3. Lippke Fretwell, Holly; Forests: Do We Get What We Pay For?; URL: http://www.perc.org/pl2sum.htm.
  4. Peters, David, Herger-Feinstein Quincy Library Group (QLG) , Record of Decision and Summary, USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Lassen, Plumas, & Tahoe National Forests, August, 1999.
  5. Peters, David, Final Environmental Impact Statement, Summary, Herger-Feinstein Quincy Library Group, USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Lassen, Plumas, & Tahoe National Forests, August, 1999
  6. Botkin, Daniel; Ecology of Discord; Oxford Univ Pr, 1992 (Trade); ISBN: 0195074696.
  7. O’Toole, Randal; Tarnished Jewels: The Case for Reforming the Park Service; URL: http://www.ti.org/index.html. This site is highly recommended for its broad scope of forest issues and well-documented sources.
  8. Kaczynski, Dr. Victor J., "No single forest practice — not timber harvesting, nor road building — can compare with the damage wildfires are inflicting on fish and fish habitat." Wallowa Whitman Nat Forest; Tanner Gulch Fire Thunderbolt Wildfire Recovery Environmental Impact Study; USDA Forest Service. Spokane, WA, 1995.
  9. Barker, Rocky, Yellowstone fires and their legacy, Chapter 10 The Legacy of 1988, 1996. URL:http://www.idahonews.com/yellowst/chap10.htm.
  10. Sierra Club Conservation Policies; Fire Management on Public Lands Policy. URL: http://www.sierraclub.org/policy/conservation/fire.asp.
  11. Frost, Evan - Greater Ecosystem Alliance, Fire & Forest Management: Myth & Reality, Columbiana: Ecology and Culture in the Pacific Northwest.
  12. Campbell, Doug; The Urban Interface; Wildfire Magazine, URL:http://www.wildfiremagazine.com/interface.shtml.
  13. Waggoner, Ed and Mike Terwilliger FIRE FIGHTING IN THE I-ZONE: "SAFE TO STAY"; Wildfire Magazine; URL:http://www.wildfiremagazine.com/waggoner.shtml.
  14. Babbitt, Bruce; MAKING PEACE WITH WILDLAND FIRE; Wildfire Magazine; URL:http://www.wildfiremagazine.com/babbitt.shtml
  15. Boswell, Evelyn; Scientists: 1988 Fires were Good for Yellowstone Park; Montana State University Communications Services; URL:http://www.montana.edu/wwwpb/univ/firetour.html. (Typical spin job, ‘it’s all positive, no negative’ -ed.)
  16. Babbitt, Bruce; ENGAGING STAKEHOLDERS TO REINVEST IN PRESCRIBED WILDLAND FIRE; Secretary of the Interior, Tall Timbers Conference, Boise, Idaho; May 9, 1996.URL:http://www.doi.gov/alcove/fire.html.
  17. Jacobs, Lynn; Waste of the West: Public Lands Ranching, 5/21/99 URL:http://www.apnm.org/waste_of_west/Preface.html.
  18. Knight, Dennis, and Linda Wallace; The Yellowstone Fires: Issues in Landscape Ecology; BioScience Magazine, Vol. 39, #10, November 1989 edition, p.700-705.
  19. Menke, John W.; Review of T. Ingalsbee, Fire Related critiques of Senate Bill 1028; Western Fire Ecology Center, 8pp, 1997.
  20. Ingalsbee, Timothy, PhD, Director, Western Fire Ecology Center, Western Ancient Forest Campaign; S. 1028; Outdated Policies that will Increase Fire Risk, Endanger Firefighters, and Harm Forest Ecosystems, AND Terhune, George; QLG (Quincy Library Group-ed.) Response; 2/6/99; URL:http://www.qlg.org/public_html/miscdoc/Ingalsbe.htm.
  21. Keiter, Robert B. and Mark S. Boyce, editors, with a foreward by Luna B. Leopold; The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: Redefining America’s Wilderness Heritage, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1991.
  22. Finney, M.A. 1991. Ecological effects of prescribed and simulated fire on the coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens [D. Don] Endl). Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, California, 194pp (acquired from the Save the Redwoods League web site as an abstract).

    23. Five papers are presented which describe studies on prescribed burning and fire effects on young- and old-growth coast redwood, simulated effects of fire on redwood trees and seedlings, and methods used for measuring flame characteristics and forest floor loading. In the prescribed burning study, both fireline intensity and surface fuel consumption were found to be related to the amount of young-growth redwood top-killing and basal sprouting responses one year after burning.

  23. Clinton, William Jefferson; Executive Order 12986 dated 1/19/96. URL: http://www.epa.gov/docs/fedrgstr/EPA-GENERAL/1996/January/Day-22/pr-765.html.
  24. FLANIGAN, JAMES; WILL INSURANCE SURVIVE? YES, BUT AT A PRICE; Wednesday, July 6, 1994.
  25. Hirsch, K.G.; M.M. Pinedo; J.M. Greenlee; Urban-Wildland Interface Fire: The I-Zone Series Overview; Bibliography; 1996. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northwest Region, Northern Forest Centre, Edmonton, Alberta. Inf. Rep. NOR-X-344.

    26. A bibliographic listing of about 2200 urban-wildland interface resource materials that have been compiled by the International Association of Wildland Fire and the Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre are listed alphabetically by author. Most items in this collection were produced prior to 1993 and pertain to the United States, Australia, and Canada.

  26. Staten, Clark; Executive Director, Emergency Response & Research Institute; "TWO DAYS of HELL" in Alemeda County, CA, URL: http://www.emergency.com/oaklfire.htm.
  27. Brass, James A.; Oakland Hills Fire Storm: Remote Sensing and Emergency Management, NASA/Ames Research Center; URL: http://geo.arc.nasa.gov/esdstaff/jskiles/fliers/all_flier_prose/oaklandfires_brass/oaklandfires_brass.html. Image available at http://geo.arc.nasa.gov/esdstaff/jskiles/fliers/gif_folder/image23/image23a.gif.
  28. Coate, Barrie D., ASCA; WHY ARE TANBARK OAKS DYING?; Mountain Network News, Vol XII, No. 10, Oct, 1999, p30.
  29. Švihra, Pavel; Western Oak Bark Beetles and Ambrosia Beetles, Killers of Live Oaks; University of California Cooperative Extension in Marin County, Pest Alert #3, June 1999.
  30. Merenlender, Adina M.; Kerry L. Heise; Colin Brooks; Effects of Subdividing Private Property on Biodiversity in California’s North Coast Oak Woodlands; TRANSACTIONS OF THE WESTERN SECTION OF THE WILDLIFE SOCIETY 34:9-20; 1998.
  31. SF Chron 9/30/99 Bark Beetles and Oak Trees Sapped of their Strength; Bark beetles threaten majestic live oaks; San Francisco Chronicle, pA21; URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/1999/09/30/MN59818.DTL.
  32. County of Santa Cruz, FORMATION AND OPERATION OF COUNTY SERVICE AREAS, no date, no signature, no originator, no logo, no document code, therefore, a typical County handout.
  33. County of Santa Cruz, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROCESSING, no date, no signature, no originator, no logo, no document code, a typical County handout.
  34. County of Santa Cruz, Assessment Bonds, 1990, YES, IT HAS A DATE!!! No signature, no logo, no document code, still a typical County handout.
  35. Orrick, Harrington & Sutcliffe; General Memorandum: Proposed Private Activity Bond Regulations and Assessment Bonds and Mello Roos Bonds, SF2-39475, 1995.
  36. State of California, Govt. Code Sections 61,000 to 61,850, Community Service District; URL: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.html/gov_table_of_contents.html.

    37. Chapter 2 – Dangerous Species Act

  37. Mann, Charles C.; Contributing Editor, Biotech Goes Wild, Genetic engineering will be essential to feed the world’s billions. But could it unleash a race of "superweeds"? No one seems to know. And nobody’s in charge of finding out. The Atlantic Monthly and Science; July/August 1999.
  38. Tickell, Oliver; It’s a rat trap, New Scientist, Jan. 23,1999.
  39. McDonnell, Tom, Director of Natural Resources, American Sheep Industry Association; Executive Order 13112 on Invasive Species. URL:http://www.pub.whitehouse.gov/uri-res/I2R?urn:pdi://oma.eop.gov.us/1999/2/3/14.text.1.
  40. Sullivan, Ron; Time to fight back against horticultural "invasion"; San Francisco Examiner, Sept. 22, 1999. URL:http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-in/article.cgi?file=/examiner/archive/1999/09/22/HABITAT4079.dtl.
  41. Howe, Kenneth; State Plague of Thistles, Nasty weed works its way into coast ranges, Sierra; San Francisco Chronicle, Tuesday, January 19, 1999. URL:http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/1999/01/19/MN12347.DTL.
  42. California Native Plant Society; EXOTIC PEST PLANTS PAGE URL:http://www.calpoly.edu/~dchippin/exotic.html.
  43. Bilger, Burkhard; Battle for the prairie; Earthwatch: 6(5):20; 1992.
  44. Sierra Club Conservation Policies; Pest Management Policy; URL: http://www.sierraclub.org/policy/conservation/pest.asp. "Bramble, W. C. and Byrnes, W. R.; Breeding bird population changes following right of way maintenance treatments. J Arboric. 18(1).p. 29 32, 1992.
  45. Brown, Lauren, Audubon Society Nature Guides: Grasslands; Knopf, N.Y.; pp19-99, 1985.
  46. Westman, W. E., Managing for biodiversity; BioScience. 40(1):26, 1990.
  47. California Exotic Pest Council; URL: http://www.igc.apc.org/ceppc/index.html.
  48. The CalFlora database; URL: http://elib.cs.berkeley.edu/calflora/advanced.html.
  49. EPA on total exposure; URL: http://www.msue.msu.edu/ipm/ipmrptv6n1h.htm.
  50. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources; The Safe and Effective Use of Pesticides, 2nd Edition; Product Code: 3324 Media: Publication, ISBN: 1-879906-43-0, 2000, 342 pp; URL: http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/merchant.ihtml?id=90&step=2.
  51. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources; IPM IN PRACTICE: PRINCIPLES AND MEHTODS OF INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT; ; Product Code: 3324 Media: Publication, ISBN: 1-879906-50-3; 2001; 290pp.
  52. Integrated Pest Management; URL: www.ipm.ucdavis.edu.
  53. Integrated Pest Management; URL: http://refuges.fws.gov.
  54. Wilkinson; URL: http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/facts-slides-self/facts/gen-pubre-carcin-wilkinson.html.
  55. DowElanco; Specimen Label GarlonTM 4, DowElanco, Indianapolis, IN, Label Code 113-12-012, EPA Date 2/22/94.
  56. DowElanco; Triclopyr Technical Information Guide.
  57. DowElanco; A Technical Look at Triclopyr.
  58. DowElanco; Material Safety Data Sheet #001314, GarlonTM 4,Herbicide, EPA Reg. Number 62719-40, 7/16/92.
  59. Young, Raymond A; Introduction to Forest Science. John Wiley & Sons NY; 1982; 528pp.
  60. Oral and Dermal Pharmokinetics of Triclopyr in Human Volunteers, Charmichael, N. G.; Nolan, R. J.; Perkins J. M.; Davies, R.; & Warrington S. J.; Human Toxicology Vol. 8, 1989; pp431-437.
  61. Hoshovsky, Marc; ELEMENT STEWARDSHIP ABSTRACT for Cytisus scoparius and Genista monspessulanus; URL: http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/esadocs/documnts/cytisco.html.
  62. Ottoboni, M. Alice; The Dose Makes the Poison: A Plain-Language Guide to Toxicology, 2nd Edition Paperback - 256 pages 2 edition (May 1, 1997) John Wiley & Sons; ISBN: 0471288373.
  63. Special Assistant to Admiral E.R. Zumwalt, Jr.; REPORT TO SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS ON THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS AND EXPOSURE TO AGENT ORANGE; Department of Veterans Affairs, May 5, 1990, available for view at website gulfwarvets.com URL: http://www.gulfwarvets.com/ao.html.
  64. Veterans and Agent Orange: Update 1996; Toxicology Summary, Chapter 3 reviews the results of animal studies published during the past three years that investigated the toxicokinetics, mechanism of action, and disease outcomes of TCDD, plus the herbicides themselves. National Academies Press, National Academy of Science; URL http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/veterans/toxicology.html.
  65. Environmental Defense Fund; 2,4,5-T Cancellation Hearings to Begin; Vol. V, No. 2 -- March 1974; URL: http://www.edf.org/pubs/EDF-Letter/1974/Mar/j_hearings.html.
  66. Edwards, J. Gordon, and Steven Milloy; 100 things you should know about DDT; URL: http://www.junkscience.com.

    67. Author’s Note: This document contains approximately 200 references to peer-reviewed studies documenting that many of the claims made that DDT and/or its decomposition products DDE and DDD were, at least, grossly exaggerated if not patently false. Please compare the technical listings in these references to those of the EDF or Greenpeace. I was unable to find references of comparable quality to refute this data.

    Chapter 3 – Endanger Specious Acts

  67. Eigen, Manfred; and Ruthild Winkler; Laws of the Game: How the Principles of Nature Govern Chance; Trans. Robert Kimber and Rita Kimber; Princeton University Press; ISBN: 0-691-02566-5. This book did more for my perspective toward understanding dynamic population distributions among competing species than any other. It is wonderful.
  68. Schramel Taylor, Lee Anne; DECISION PROVIDES PROTECTION FOR OWLS & OTHER WILDLIFE IN N. SIERRA NEVADA; AUGUST 20, 1999. URL:http://www.r5.fs.fed.us/hfqlg/.
  69. Black, Michael D. Bay Institute of San Francisco and California Studies Association, California’s Last Salmon: Unnatural Policies of Natural Resource Agencies; Central Coast Watershed Council, Annual Lecture Series, 3/20/99.
  70. Lydon, Sandy; Professor of History, Cabrillo College, Early settlers shunned dirty river water; Santa Cruz County Sentinel, 3/24/97.
  71. Lydon, Sandy; Professor of History, Cabrillo College, A polluted Soquel Creek wasn’t fit to drink; Santa Cruz County Sentinel, 3/31/97.
  72. De Alessi, M.; Fishing for Solutions, The State of the World’s Fisheries, Figure 5-8, Production Trend for Atlantic Salmon, 1981-1994, Earth Report 2000, Revisiting the True State of the Planet, Competitive Enterprise Institute, p111.
  73. Waples, R. S.; NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS F/NWC-194, Definition of "Species" Under the Endangered Species Act: Application to Pacific Salmon; Summary Definition of Evolutionary Significant Unit, March 1991.
  74. Buchal, James; The Great Salmon Hoax; Iconoclast; 1998; URL http://www.buchal.com/hoax.html.
  75. Gobalet, Kenneth W. & Terry L. Jones; Prehistoric Native American Fisheries of the Central California Coast; Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 124: pp817, 819, 821; 1995.
  76. Gobalet, Kenneth W; Fish Remains from Nine Archaeological Sites in Richmond and San Pablo, Contra Costa County California; California Fish and Game, 76(4): p240, 1990.
  77. Follett, W. I.; FISH REMAINS FROM THE WEST BERKELEY SHELLMOUND (CA-Ala-307), ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA; California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, pp77, 79.
  78. Ricker, John, & Terry Butler; Community Resources Agency, Watershed Management Section, County of Santa Cruz, SAN LORENZO RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN, FISHERY HABITAT AND THE AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM TECHNICAL SECTION, November 1979.
  79. MacQuarrie, D.W.; J.R. Markert; W.E. Van Stone; Photoperiod-Induced Off-Season Spawning of Coho Salmon (Oncorgyncus kisutch), Annals of Biology, Animal Biochemistry, and Biophysiology, Vol. 18, pp1051-1058, 1978.
  80. Flagg, T.A., and C.E. Nash (editors). 1999. A conceptual framework for conservation hatchery strategies for Pacific salmonids. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-38, 46 p. U.S. Dept. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-38, 48 p.
  81. Beamish, R.J., Mahnken, C., and C.M. Neville; Hatchery and wild production of Pacific salmon in relation to large-scale, natural shifts in the productivity of the marine environment. Ices Journal of Marine Science 54(6):1200-15, 1997.
  82. Coronado, Claribel and Ray Hilborn, 1998, Spatial and temporal factors affecting survival in coho salmon (Oncorgyncus kisutch) in the Pacific Northwest, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. pp. 2067-2077.
  83. Kaczynski, V. W.; April, 1998; Comments on the National Marine Fisheries Service’s proposed rule for designated critical habitat for southern Oregon; Northern California Coast Coho Salmon Unpublished memo prepared for: Oregon Forest Industries Council, Northwest Forestry Association, California Forestry Association.
  84. Fergus, Mike, FEDERAL RESOURCE AGENCY SAYS GROWING WEST COAST SEAL, SEA LION POPULATIONS INCREASINGLY IN CONFLICT WITH HUMANS, SALMON; NOAA PRESS RELEASE Southwest Region, 2/11/99.
  85. Harmon, J. R., K. L. Thomas, K. W. McIintyre, and N. N. Paasch; Prevalence of marine-mammal tooth and claw abrasions on adult anadromous salmonids returning to the Snake River; N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 14:661-663. 1994.
  86. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service; Report to Congress, Impacts of California Sea Lions and Pacific Harbor Seals on Salmonids and West Coast Ecosystems, February 10, 1999.
  87. Briggs, Robert O., Competition Between the Waddell Creek Forest and Creek for Limited Dry Season Ground-Stored Water, Davenport Geological Society, Oct. 1997, 22pp.
  88. Shapovalov, Leo & Allan C. Taft, The Life Histories of Steelhead, Rainbow Trout, and Silver Salmon, California Department of Fish and Game, Fish Bulletin 98, 1954, 375p.
  89. Kaczynski, Victor W.; Marine survival of OPIA hatchery coho salmon related to marine temperatures; Proceedings of the 49th Annual Pacific Northwest Fish Culture Conference. Boise, ID. Pp131-147. 1998.
  90. Forests & Salmon, Forest-Fisheries Management Relationships in Northern California During the 19th & 20th Centuries; The Forest Foundation, August 1998.
  91. Alley, DW; Recommended Monitoring and Logging Guidelines for the Soquel Demonstration State Forest Related to Aquatic Resources and Flood Control, Dec. 1992.
  92. INITIAL STATEMENT OF REASONS, Protection for Threatened and Impaired Watersheds, [July 23, 1999], Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
  93. Simon, Julian L. and Aaron Wildavsky, Extinction: Species Loss Revisited, NWI Resource, Volume 5, Issue 1, Fall, 1994, p. 4f. (Note: An excellent foundation for understanding the conflicting claims about species loss. The authors also wrote "On Species Loss, The Absence of Data and Risks to Humanity," in The Resourceful Earth: A Response to Global 2000.)
  94. DRAFT Review Pursuant to Memorandum of Agreement between the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Southwest Region and the State of California (State) on North Coast Steelhead Trout, analysis of the California Forest Practice Rules (FPR): The NMFS review of the FPRs to the State, and the State response to NMFS analysis. Dated 7/10/98.

    95. Chapter 4 – A Watershed, Eventually?

  95. National Marine Fisheries Service, DRAFT Review Pursuant to Memorandum of Agreement between the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Southwest Region and the State of California (State) on North Coast Steelhead Trout, analysis of the California Forest Practice Rules (FPR): The NMFS review of the FPRs to the State, and the State response to NMFS analysis. Dated 7/10/98.
  96. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, CENTRAL COAST REGION, San Lorenzo River Nitrate Total Maximum Daily Load and Nitrate Objective, STAFF REPORT FOR REGULAR MEETING OF May 19, 2000, Prepared on February 9, 2000.
  97. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CENTRAL COAST REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, San Lorenzo River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load for Nitrate, Santa Cruz, California (Impaired Waters: San Lorenzo River, Carbonera Creek, Shingle Mill Creek, and Lompico Creek), DRAFT February 7, 2000.
  98. Santa Cruz County Sewage Treatment District, 1999, Annual Report.
  99. Copeland, Claudia, Specialist in Environmental Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Congressional Research Service; Report for Congress 98-150: The Clean Water Action Plan: Background and Early Implementation; Updated May 3, 1999. Obtained from http://www.cnie.org.
  100. FINDINGS FOR THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL NONPOINT PROGRAM, California Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Program Submittal, September 1995, authorized under Section 6217(a) of the Coastal Zone Act Reauthorization Amendments of 1990 (CZARA).
  101. Clean Water Act of 1972, Section 303(d) , U.S. Code, Title 33, Chapter 26, Subchapter III, Section 1313, URL: http://uscode.house.gov/usc.htm.
  102. Nixon, Scott W. & Michael E. Q. Pilson; Nitrogen in Estuarine and Coastal Marine Ecosystems, excerpted from: Carpenter, Edward J. & Douglas G. Capone; Nitrogen in the Marine Environment; Chapter 16; pp565-648; ISBN 0-12-160280-X; Academic Press, 1983.
  103. Research on EPA interpretations of TMDL derived from http://www.epa.gov/owow/tmdl.
  104. Clean Water Act Amendments of 1987, Section 319, U.S. Code, Title 33, Chapter 26, Subchapter III, Sections: 1288 Areawide Waste Treatment Management, 1311 Effluent Limitations, 1314 Information & Guidelines, 1329 Nonpoint Source Management Programs. URL: http://uscode.house.gov/usc.htm.
  105. Septic system history in the San Lorenzo Valley is based upon interviews with long-time contractors and consultants.

Endnotes to Part V

Chapter 1 – An Unsustainable Agenda

  1. Big Creek Lumber Co., Inc. v. County of San Mateo, 31 Cal. App. 4th 418 (1st Dist. 1995) (holding that county zoning ordinance that regulated where timber operations could occur was not preempted by the FPA).
  2. Notes on formation of TIMBER-TAC and false testimony re "consensus" were derived from public testimony of: Bob Berlage, Big Creek Lumber; Steven Butler, Ed Tunheim Professional Foresters; Mark Deming, Principle Planner, County of Santa Cruz; Jodi Frediani, Sierra Club; and Jan Beautz and Mardi Wormhoudt, Supervisors, County of Santa Cruz. Testimony at the Board of Supervisors, County of Santa Cruz, dated 14 December 1999.
  3. Arnold, Ron and Alan Gottlieb, Trashing the Economy, (Bellevue, Washington: Free Enterprise Press, 1993), p. 242.
  4. Op Cit. to California Board of Forestry, Coho Considerations, document for consideration as amendments to the Forest Practice Rules.
  5. Lewis, Jack and Raymond M Rice; Site Conditions Related to Erosion on Private Timberlands in Northern California: Final Report. Critical Sites Erosion Study; California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Forest Practice Section, 1989 Estimated total of 0.31 cubic yards per year per acre net sediment introduced to streams attributable to logging pp62-65.
  6. Rice, Raymond M. and Jack Lewis; Estimating Erosion Risks Associated with Logging and Forest Roads in Northwestern California; Water Resources Bulletin (27)5; 1991 p810.
  7. Big Creek Lumber Company vs. County of Santa Cruz, Petition of Writ of Mandate and Declaratory and Other Relief; Case No. 13486.
  8. Big Creek Lumber Company vs. County of Santa Cruz, Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Preemptory Writ of Mandate and Declaratory and Other Relief; Case No. 13486.
  9. INITIAL STATEMENT OF REASONS, Protection for Threatened and Impaired Watersheds, 1999, [July 23, 1999], Title 14 of the CA Code of Regulations.
  10. Hill, Norman E., Chief Counsel for the California Department of Forestry and fire Protection, Appeals of NTMP 1-99-003 SCR and THP 1-99-009 SCR.
  11. Butler, Steven, RPF, PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CALIFORNIA FOREST PRACTICE RULES; Draft dated 4/4/98.
  12. References to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) came from the Ceres Server. URL: http://ceres.ca.gov/ceqa/. Note, for specific articles from the Act, change the digit in the final file name, i.e. http://ceres.ca.gov/ceqa/guidelines/art5.html where art5 is the text for Article 5 of the CEQA handbook.
  13. Cline, Alan; Prioritization Process Using Delphi Technique; Carolla Development White Paper; 1997-1998; URL:http://www.carolla.com/wp-delph.htm. A good description of the original Delphi consensus process.
  14. Spitzer, Skip; Santa Cruz Action Network (SCAN); Decision-making by consensus: A Brief Introduction; URL :http://gate.cruzio.com/~scan.
  15. ACTION–Santa Cruz County, SEED Summit on Sustainability; Mar. '94, p2.
  16. Ibid. ACTION–SCC; Preliminary Reports, Ecosystem Management & Biodiversity, Team Contact person and contributors to date list, SEEDing a Sustainable Future; March 1994, p6.
  17. Copies of submissions and draft critiques from Dean Rimmerman of Earth First! and Randall Morgan of the California Native Plant Society.
  18. Shaw, Michael; Santa Cruz Residential Program h; submission for consideration of local Agenda 21.
  19. Santa Cruz County Earth Day Journal, Sustainable Santa Cruz, Unlimited Possibilities… Earth Day 1995, April 1995, p8.
  20. Vande Pol, Mark Edward & Rudnick, Lisa; Personal File References to development and notes taken from various Agenda 21 meetings.
  21. Various facsimile documents between Jeannie Nordland of ACTION–SCC, Lisa Rudnick, and Mark Vande Pol concerning final adoption of the Santa Cruz Local Agenda 21 Biodiversity and Ecosystem Management Plan.
  22. Nordland, Jeanne, An Agenda 21 Report for Santa Cruz County; URL:http://www.cruzio.com/~ecocruz/Agenda21/index.html.
  23. Nordland, Jeanne, Agenda 21 Biodiversity and Ecosystem Management Document; Chairpersons Dean Rimerman & Betsi Sites, Steve Singer, Lisa Rudnick, Mark Vande Pol, Grey, Dennis P. Davie, Howard Liebenberg, Ted Jones, Deidre Kerwin, Kent Reeves, Dawn Pencovic, Robert LaRosa, Kathleen VanVelsor, Vicki Nichols, Frank Barron, Michael Shaw, Randall Morgan, Elizabeth Herbert, Jade Lovell, Julie Hendricks, Celia & Peter Scott, Mary Tsalis, Bonnie Hurd, Rich Casale, Josh Fodor, Fred McPherson, Thom Sutfin, Steve Butler, Dave Hope, Jerry Busch, & Chris Johnson-Lyon. (Compiled & final edit by Jeanne Nordland). URL:http://www.cruzio.com/~ecocruz/Agenda21/A21Ch02.html.
  24. Mauriello , Susan A., J.D., County Administrative Officer, MEASURE C ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, JUNE 8, 1999; URL: http://www.co.santa-cruz.ca.us/bds/19990608/079.pdf.

    25. "Measure C also established a series of eleven principles and policies to guide local government efforts related to: offshore oil drilling; global warming and renewable energy resources; protection of the ozone layer; forest protection and restoration; greenbelt protection and preservation; recycling; toxic and radioactive materials; endangered species and biological diversity; development of a sustainable local economy; future growth and development; and education and outreach."

  25. Mauriello , Susan A., JD, County Administrative Officer, CONSIDER ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES TO GUIDE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, November 3,200, attachment to the proposed Ordinance: ORDINANCE ENACTING CHAPTER 16 OF THE SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CODE RELATING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES TO GUIDE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, URL:http://www.co.santa-cruz.ca.us/bds/20001114/037.pdf.
  26. IGC Publishing; Sustainable Development International; Welcome to Sustainable Development International, which aims to educate the readership by providing a showcase for strategies and technologies for local-global Agenda 21 implementation. http://www.sustdev.org/about/.
  27. Absent, Name Conspicuously, United Nations Global Agenda 21; United Nations Publication E.93.1.11, ISBN 92-1-10059-4, URL: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/agenda21text.htm.
  28. Solzhenitsyn, Aleksandr Isaevich; The Gulag Archipelago Vol. I; Thomas P. Whitney (Translator), Reprint Vol 001, May 1997, ISBN: 0813332893 672pp.
  29. United Nations Commission on Global Governance, Our Global Neighborhood, The Report of the Commission on Global Governance; paperback, $14.95, ISBN 0-19-827997-3, 410 pages. Oxford University Press. Call (919) 677-0977).
  30. Commission on Global Governance, Our Global Neighborhood; Phasing Out the Veto; URL:http://www.cgg.ch/unreform2.htm#veto.
  31. Reed F. Noss, The Wildlands Project, Wild Earth, Special Issue, 1992, p. 21. (Note: Wild Earth is published by the Cenozoic Society, editorial address: P.O. Box 492, Canton NY 13617, (315) 379-9940. Dave Foreman and Reed F. Noss are Directors.) URL: http://www.wildlandsproject.org.
  32. Convention on Biological Diversity, UNEP/CBD/COP2/5, 21, Report of the First Meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, September 1995, p2.
  33. Sovereignty International, This site has more resources to investigate the Agenda 21 than any other. URL:http://www.sovereignty.net/p/sd/a21.
  34. Global Biodiversity Assessment, URL: http://www.biodiv.org ;Cambridge University Press.
  35. OP Cit., IUCN Membership Guidelines, 1996, p4.
  36. OP Cit., IUCN: Membership List, June, 1998, p21.
  37. OP Cit., Dues: Membership Guidelines, IUCN, 1996, p20.
  38. Gorbachev, Mikhail; The Earth Charter speech at the Rio+5 Forum; URL: http://www.gci.ch/GreenCrossFamily/gorby/newspeeches/speeches/speech18.3.97.html.
  39. Meet Maurice Strong, ecologic, November/December, 1995, p4.
  40. Hage, Wayne; STORM OVER RANGELANDS, PRIVATE RGHTS IN Federal LANDS; Free Enterprise Press, 1994, ISBN 0-939571-15-3.
  41. Sustainable America: A New Consensus; available from the U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402, ISBN 0-16-0485299-0.
  42. Lamb, Henry; New Treaty In the Making, Covenant on Environment and Development; (treaty law pursuant to Agenda 21) eco-logic; Jan./Feb., 1998.
  43. Lamb, Henry; NGOs Drive Global Climate Agenda; 1999.
  44. Lamb, Henry; World Concerns; Sovereignty Intl., Vol. 1, #2, Dec. 2, 1997.
  45. Rummel, R.J.; Death by Government; Transaction Pub; ISBN: 1560009276; March 1997; URL: http://www.bigeye.com/rummel.htm.
  46. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Book III, translated by Hugh Treddenick, Penguin Books, 1976.
  47. Christ, Jesus, House of David; Matthew 7:20, The Holy Bible, King James Version, 1611, Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, TN,
  48. Ibid. Jesus, Matthew 7:21.

    49. Chapter 2 – Defy Gravity

  49. Knutson, Gary A., Auditor/Controller, County of Santa Cruz; Final Budget for the County of Santa Cruz, Fiscal Year, 1999-2000.
  50. Op Cit.; 1995-1997 Survey of Graduates, UCSC; URL: http://planning.ucsc.edu/IRPS/ENROLLMT/GRADS/9597/REPORT.PDF.
  51. Mayhugh, Candice Jackson; Liberal LSAT Bias; Accuracy in Academia Address Delivered at AIA’s 1998 Summer Conference at Geo. Washington University.
  52. Haga, Dr. William James, Nicholas Acocella, Haga’s Law, Why Nothing Works and No One Can Fix It and the More You Try to Fix It the Worse It Gets; William Morrow & Co. 1980. Out of pint.
  53. Parkinson, Pete, Principle Planner County of Santa Cruz, Notice of Exemption From the California Environmental Quality Act; Dated 4/12/94.
  54. Harris, Joel Chandler, HOW BRER RABBIT WAS TOO SHARP FOR MR. FOX, Uncle Remus, His Songs and His Sayings, Hawthorn Books, Inc., ISBN: 0-8015-8106-0, p18.
  55. Op Cit., Harris, THE WONDERFUL TAR BABY STORY, p7.
  56. Clean Water Act of 1972, Section 303(d) , U.S. Code, Title 33, Chapter 26, Subchapter III, Section 1313, URL:http://uscode.house.gov/usc.htm.
  57. Clean Water Act Amendments of 1987, Section 319, U.S. Code, Title 33, Chapter 26, Subchapter III, Sections: 1288 Areawide Waste Treatment Management, 1311 Effluent Limitations, 1314 Information & Guidelines, 1329 Nonpoint Source Management Programs. URL:http://uscode.house.gov/usc.htm.
  58. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1998 CALIFORNIA 303(d) LIST AND TMDL PRIORITY SCHEDULE, 12-May-99.pp 36,41, &45.
  59. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, CENTRAL COAST REGION, San Lorenzo River Nitrate Total Maximum Daily Load and Nitrate Objective, STAFF REPORT FOR REGULAR MEETING OF May 19, 2000, February 7, 2000.
  60. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, CENTRAL COAST REGION, San Lorenzo River Nitrate Total Maximum Daily Load and Nitrate Objective, STAFF REPORT FOR REGULAR MEETING OF May 19, 2000, February 9, 2000.
  61. Daily Load for Nitrate Santa Cruz, California (Impaired Waters: San Lorenzo River, Carbonera Creek, Shingle Mill Creek, and Lompico Creek), Executive Summary, DRAFT Plan for California’s Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program; February 7, 2000, pp ii-v.
  62. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Coast Region, San Lorenzo River Nitrate TMDL and Nitrate Objective; Staff Report for Regular Meeting of May 19, 2000, 36pp.
  63. Planning Department, County of Santa Cruz; SAN LORENZO RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN, Appendix C, Water Quality Analyses, historic nitrate values, pp137-172, 12/18/79.
  64. Ricker, John, & Mount, Jeffry; Community Resources Agency, Watershed Management Section, County of Santa Cruz, SAN LORENZO RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN, HYDROLOGY TECHNICAL SECTION, November 1979 (Part IV, Chap. 4, Sec. I).
  65. Ricker, John, Planning Department, Co. of Santa Cruz, SAN LORENZO RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN, PHYSIOGRAPHY AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT TECHNICAL SECTIONS, 11/79.
  66. Aston, Robert; Community Resources Agency, Watershed Management Section, County of Santa Cruz, SAN LORENZO RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN, WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL SECTION, October 1979.
  67. California Coastal Commission, FINDINGS FOR THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL NONPOINT PROGRAM, California Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Program Submittal, September 1995, authorized under Section 6217(a) of the Coastal Zone Act Reauthorization Amendments of 1990 (CZARA).
  68. Copeland, Claudia, Specialist in Environmental Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Congressional Research Service; Report for Congress 98-150: The Clean Water Action Plan: Background and Early Implementation; Updated May 3, 1999. Obtained from http://www.cnie.org.
  69. EPA interpretations of TMDL derived from http://www.epa.gov/owow/tmdl.
  70. Convention for the Prevention of Marine Pollution from Land-based Sources (1974 Paris Convention) http://www.nesarc.org.
  71. County of Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz County Sensitive Habitats Protection Ordinance; http://www.co.santa-cruz.ca.us/pln/sensitiv.htm.
  72. County of Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz County Riparian Corridor Protection Ordinance; http://www.co.santa-cruz.ca.us/pln/riparian.htm.
  73. Haynes, Al; Letter to Garth W. Griffen, NMFS; 1/6/97.
  74. Smith, Jerry, PhD; Letter to Garth W. Griffen, NMFS; 1/6/97.
  75. Alley, Don; Letter to Garth W. Griffen, NMFS; 1/6/97.
  76. Schuman, Todd, Steelhead Listing Project, Letter to NMFS Re: ONRC Petition to List Pacific Coastal Steelhead Trout Populations; 5/5/94.
  77. 318. Clark, Jamie Rappaport, Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; Designated Critical Hapitat: Critical Habitat for 19 Evolutionarily Significant Units of Salmon and Steelhead in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and California; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, #7764, Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 32 / 2/16/2000 / Rules and Regulations.
  78. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NMFS, PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED LISTING OF STEELHEAD TROUT; 10/17 1996.
  79. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-27 Status Review of West Coast Steelhead from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California, Aug. 1996.
  80. Nielsen, Jennifer L., Gan, C. A.; Wright, J. M.; Morris, D. B.; and Thomas, W. K.; Biogeographic distribution of mitochondrial and nuclear markers for southern steelhead; Molecular Marine Biology and Biotech. 3(5):281-293.
  81. Information Center for the Environment, Click ICEMaps2 at http://ice.ucdavis.edu.

    82. Chapter 3 – The Strategy of the Commoners

  82. Title 12 U.S.C, Section 95b Emergency War Powers: "The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March 4, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subsection (b) of section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended (12 U.S.C., 95a), are hereby approved and confirmed." - (March 9, 1933, c. 1, Title 1, 1, 48 Stat. 1).
  83. National Emergency of March 9, 1933 amended the War Powers Act to include the American People as enemies. In Title 1, Section 1 it says: "The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March 4, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subdivision (b) of section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, are hereby approved and confirmed."
  84. Ibid. National Emergency of March 9, 1933 "Section 2. Subdivision (b) of section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, (40 Stat. L. 411), as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: emergency declared by the President, the President may, through any agency that he may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or payments by banking institutions as defined by the President, and export, hoarding, melting, or earmarking of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency, BY ANY PERSON WITHIN THE UNITED STATES OR ANY PLACE SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF."
  85. Barefoot’s World, Resources documenting the accrual of unconstitutional powers to the national government. URL: http://www.barefootsworld.net/.
  86. Carter, James Earl, President of the United States, Executive Order 11990, Protection of Wetlands, May 24, 1977; 42 FR 26961; URL:http://www.wetlands.com/fed/exo11990.htm.
  87. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES); URL: http://www.cites.org/CITES/eng/index.shtml, or better, http://environment.harvard.edu/guides/intenvpol/indexes/treaties/CITES.html.
  88. Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS); URL: http://sedac.ciesin.org/pidb/texts/migratory.wild.animals.1979.html.
  89. Convention for the Prevention of Marine Pollution from Land-based Sources (1974 Paris Convention) http://www.nesarc.org.
  90. Title 16 United States Code Sections 1532 Definitions (Endangered Species Act) http://uscode.house.gov/usc.htm.
  91. CONVENTION ON NATURE PROTECTION AND WILD LIFE PRESERVATION IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE (1940); Entered into force: 1 May 1942; 56 Stat. 1354; TS 981; URL: http://sedac.ciesin.org/pidb/texts/wildlife.western.hemisphere.1940.html.
  92. U.S. Supreme Court; CITY OF MONTEREY v. DEL MONTE DUNES; No. 97—1235. Argued October 7, 1998–Decided May 24, 1999.
  93. 16 USC 1533 Determination of endangered species and threatened species.
  94. 16 USC 1537 International Cooperation (ESA).
  95. 16 USC 1538 Prohibited acts (ESA).
  96. Madison, James, et al., The Constitution of the United States of America; Cato Institute, ISBN 1-882577-67-1.
  97. Marcussen, Lana E.; CIRCA; JEFF & TINA ESPLIN, et. al., v. WILLIAM J. CLINTON; BRUCE BABBITT, Defendants, COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DEPRIVATIONS OF Federal CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE-DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, CIV 00-0248 PCT PGR.
  98. U.S. Supreme Court NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES, 505 U.S. 144 (1992); Nos. 91-543, 91-558 and 91-563 Argued March 30, 1992, Decided June 19, 1992.
  99. Kmiec, Douglas W.; The Court Rediscovers Federalism; Heritage Foundation Policy Review, September-October, 1997.

 

Text for reference citation to this book:

by Vande Pol, Mark Edward; Natural Process: That Environmental Laws May Serve the Laws of Nature, Library of Congress Control Number: 2001092201; ISBN: 0-9711793-0-1; Wildergarten Press, 2001; URL: http://www.wildergarten.com; 455pp.

Natural Process: That Environmental Laws May Serve the Laws of Nature, ISBN: 0-9711793-0-1. Copyrights © 1999, 2000, & 2001 by Mark Edward Vande Pol. All rights reserved.